Performance
Hillside Middle — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Hillside Middle in Simi Valley, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
32%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
10%
Exceeded the standard
362
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 8 | 32% | 10% | 362 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 50% 1,069 tested | 37% 1,069 tested | 32% 362 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 55% 563 tested | 33% 562 tested | 28% 198 tested |
| Male | 44% 503 tested | 40% 504 tested | 35% 161 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 76% 148 tested | 72% 147 tested | 58% 43 tested |
| Black or African American | 47% 17 tested | 29% 17 tested | - |
| Filipino | 68% 37 tested | 54% 37 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 34% 486 tested | 19% 486 tested | 13% 178 tested |
| White | 58% 323 tested | 45% 324 tested | 45% 111 tested |
| Two or more races | 63% 52 tested | 42% 52 tested | 63% 16 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 37% 535 tested | 25% 535 tested | 19% 195 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 63% 534 tested | 49% 534 tested | 46% 167 tested |
| Homeless | 30% 27 tested | 22% 27 tested | 23% 13 tested |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 4% 79 tested | 3% 79 tested | 3% 30 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 4% 78 tested | 3% 78 tested | 3% 29 tested |
| Long term English learners | 6% 33 tested | 3% 33 tested | - |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 43% 183 tested | 31% 184 tested | 19% 68 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 58% 38 tested | 46% 37 tested | 42% 12 tested |
| Ever an English learner | 31% 262 tested | 22% 263 tested | 14% 98 tested |
| Never an English learner | 56% 807 tested | 41% 806 tested | 38% 264 tested |
| English only | 56% 769 tested | 41% 769 tested | 38% 252 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 11% 157 tested | 8% 157 tested | 17% 54 tested |
| No reported disability | 57% 912 tested | 42% 912 tested | 34% 308 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 22% 64 tested | 17% 64 tested | 6% 31 tested |
| Parent high school graduate | 23% 149 tested | 15% 149 tested | 13% 52 tested |
| Parent some college | 41% 202 tested | 23% 202 tested | 25% 77 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 60% 342 tested | 44% 342 tested | 39% 99 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 67% 263 tested | 56% 263 tested | 52% 89 tested |
View 16 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not foster youth | 50% 1,069 tested | 37% 1,069 tested | 32% 362 tested |
| Not migrant education | 50% 1,069 tested | 37% 1,069 tested | 32% 362 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 50% 1,062 tested | 37% 1,062 tested | 31% 357 tested |
| Not homeless | 51% 1,042 tested | 37% 1,042 tested | 32% 349 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 54% 990 tested | 39% 990 tested | 34% 332 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 28% 336 tested | 16% 336 tested | 9% 132 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 66% 203 tested | 51% 204 tested | 51% 68 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 47% 150 tested | 25% 150 tested | 26% 46 tested |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 46% 120 tested | 34% 120 tested | 35% 43 tested |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 77% 106 tested | 76% 105 tested | 60% 30 tested |
| Parent education declined to state | 47% 49 tested | 29% 49 tested | 14% 14 tested |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 74% 42 tested | 62% 42 tested | 54% 13 tested |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 68% 34 tested | 44% 34 tested | 64% 11 tested |
| Filipino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 71% 28 tested | 64% 28 tested | - |
| Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 56% 18 tested | 39% 18 tested | - |
| Black or African American (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 64% 11 tested | 45% 11 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
36%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
72%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
97
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 34 | 18% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 71% |
| Grade 7 | 28 | 18% | 18% | 29% | 36% | 64% |
| Grade 8 | 35 | 6% | 14% | 46% | 34% | 80% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (21 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 95 | 12% | 15% | 37% | 37% | 74% |
| No Special Education Services | 86 | 8% | 14% | 38% | 40% | 78% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 83 | 13% | 14% | 40% | 33% | 72% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 83 | 13% | 14% | 40% | 33% | 72% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 78 | 12% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 74% |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 70 | 7% | 9% | 40% | 44% | 84% |
| Female | 51 | 8% | 16% | 41% | 35% | 76% |
| Male | 46 | 20% | 13% | 30% | 37% | 67% |
| LTEL | 32 | 16% | 9% | 47% | 28% | 75% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 19 | 21% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 63% |
| Special Education Services | 11 | 55% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 27% |
| Asian | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 2 years in program | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Homeless | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 1 year in program | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 4 years in program | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 5 years in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Vietnamese | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| White | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.